WHATEVER PODCAST ANDREW WILSON

Who is Andrew Wilson? This is a common question among Redpill content watchers.
Andrew Wilson has become a very famous debater in Redpill content due to his unique style of debate. He is popular among adults who appreciate discussions on men’s rights. Andrew Wilson is one of the Redpill content creators who also supports men’s rights.

In recent years, he has debated on the ‘Whatever’ podcast and his own channel, ‘The Crucible,’ which has gained a lot of views. Today, we have a topic about Andrew Wilson, and we will discuss everything about him.

Andrew Wilson

Andrew Wilson was born and raised in a Christian household and became an Orthodox Christian in 2021. He is a political satirist and political analyst.

He started debating with liberals on Facebook through a live show named “Tabletop.” Later, in 2021, he created a YouTube channel called “The Crucible” and became the host of ‘The Crucible’ alongside Dave Smith.

Andrew Wilson trained his debate skills on DebateUniversity.com.

In one of his interviews on YouTube, he mentioned that his dad has been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis and that his father is his role model. In the same video, when the moderator asked him if he receives threats, Andrew replied, “I get them in DMs. They threaten my wife, kids, my family members, and my parents.”

Andrew Wilson’s father was a businessman in the United States, though not much detail is available about him.

Andrew enjoys reading both fiction (science fiction and fantasy) and non-fiction (war history and social history). He also plays the guitar.

Wife: Rachel Wilson
Children: 2 with Andrew Wilson

Rachel Wilson is an Orthodox Christian mother of five children. She had her first child at 20 with her high school boyfriend; one child is from another man, and the remaining two are with Andrew Wilson.

Rachel is a homeschooling advocate who lives in the rural Midwest. When she is not attending to her duties to her family and church, she enjoys fitness, cooking, researching history, and studying philosophy and religion. Rachel is also a licensed firearms instructor specializing in home defense and concealed carry instruction.

Debate Summary: Andrew Wilson vs. college feminist

During the debate, Andrew and a self-identified liberal feminist engaged in a discussion about the principles of democracy and voting rights. The conversation started with Wilson questioning whether everyone living in a country should automatically have the right to vote.

The liberal feminist argued that the core of democracy lies in allowing all citizens to participate in the voting process. Wilson countered by pointing out that various forms of government, including monarchies and oppressive regimes, have functioned effectively throughout history, though not always for the benefit of the people.

The liberal feminist insisted that a government should serve its citizens  interests arguing that oppressive governments fail to do this. Wilson responded by noting that historical monarchies included various power structures beyond just one ruler, such as nobles and knights, which he compared to modern aristocratic classes.

He challenged the liberal feminist to provide a justification for universal suffrage beyond the assertion that it is a democratic right.

The debate continued with Wilson questioning why younger individuals, or those deemed too young to grasp political complexities, should be excluded from voting. The liberal feminist agreed that age limitations are reasonable, citing the need for maturity and understanding in voting decisions. Wilson argued that if intelligence and engagement are criteria, many adults might also be considered unfit to vote.

Throughout the discussion, Wilson pressed the liberal feminist to offer a clear, non-circular reason for why everyone should have the right to vote. The liberal feminist reiterated her belief that living in a country should entitle individuals to a say in its governance, asserting that excluding people from voting undermines their freedom. Wilson remained unconvinced, suggesting that democracy should not automatically extend voting rights to everyone, particularly those he deemed uninformed or unintelligent.

This intense debate underscored the complexities and differing views on democracy, voting rights, and the criteria for political participation.

Debate Summary: Andrew Wilson vs. Girl on Ambition and Gender Roles

In a recent debate, Andrew Wilson and a girl discussed the importance of ambition in women and gender roles within relationships. Andrew argued that men don’t care about women’s ambition, especially regarding careers and education. He believes men prefer women who are good enough in their roles and don’t need to strive for more.

For him, ambition means aiming for big achievements or climbing the social ladder, which he says isn’t a priority for men in a partner. Andrew also stated that men prefer women who focus on family over careers and that if a woman is ambitious about family life, like being a great homemaker, that’s acceptable. He believes that in relationships where the man earns more, the woman should prioritize taking care of the children and the home.

According to Andrew, women should follow their husband’s lead, especially if he’s the main breadwinner, and be willing to give up their careers to focus on family if that’s what the husband wants.

On the other hand, the girl argued that most people want a partner with goals because goals give life meaning. She believes ambition is important and doesn’t have to be limited to jobs; it can include family goals or personal growth. She thinks women can have both a career and children and that it’s not an either-or situation.

The girl believes that having goals and ambitions, even within a family context, is important for personal fulfillment. She challenged the idea that women should just do what their husbands want and supports a partnership where both people can pursue their ambitions and support each other.

The key points of contention were the definition and importance of ambition, with Andrew saying men don’t care about women’s ambitions in careers and education, while the girl believes any kind of ambition is valuable in a partner. Regarding career versus family, Andrew thinks women should put family first, especially if the husband earns more, but the girl believes women can balance both career and family.

On gender roles, Andrew supports traditional gender roles where the man leads and the woman follows, particularly in family matters, while the girl advocates for a more equal approach where both partners’ ambitions are considered. This debate highlights two very different views on gender roles, the importance of ambition in women, and family responsibilities, with Andrew sticking to a traditional perspective and the girl pushing for a more modern approach where women can chase both career and family dreams.

Social media about Andrew Wilson

Andrew Wilson runs a podcast on his YouTube channel called “The Crucible,” which has almost 113k followers. Andrew is very active on Twitter, posting daily about events related to the Redpill niche. His Twitter account has almost 40k followers.